The biggest player on Canada's stock markets, an
expression of Quebecois nationalism -- "the caisse" is
a conflicted mess. If anyone can resolve it, Henri-Paul
Rousseau can
By
Konrad Yakabuski
Report
on Business magazine
May 2003
The door to Henri-Paul Rousseau's office
swings open and the unsmiling chairman and CEO of the
Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec steps forward.
His beefy 6-foot-4 figure fills the door frame. The
Oliver Hardy looks-down to the mustache-are in character.
Rousseau can be a bit of a grouch, even to friends. "Honestly,
I don't see myself as a grump," he protests. "But
if I don't like something, it's probably easy to read.
Since
he took over at Quebec's massive pension fund manager
in September, Rousseau has seen little there
that is to his liking. From senior management to
corporate strategy, he has thrown out much of the old.
Even the
caisse's unofficial double-barrelled mandate-to seek
returns and pump up Quebec's entrepreneurial class-is
passe. Past caisse CEOs always insisted, evidence
to the contrary, that they never sacrificed returns
to
build Quebec Inc. Rousseau, a former university professor
and Laurentian Bank of Canada CEO, wants to silence
the skeptics by entrenching the returns-first obligation
in law. Should he succeed, it will mark the end of
almost four decades that the caisse has been used
as a tool of economic nationalism. Now that would be
a
quiet revolution.
If ever there was a moment to reconsider
the caisse's mission, this is it. The $130-billion
pension fund
manager, by far Canada's biggest, is reeling from
two disastrous years: It posted a -4.9% result in 2001
and a -9.6% return last year, putting it far back
of
its peers. Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board lost
only 2% of its value last year; the median return
for the Canadian industry was -4.6%. Much of the difference
between the caisse and the rest is the result of
the
caisse's overindulgence in one sector, communications
and technology. The caisse's boldest move ever-the
$2.9 billion it invested to help Quebecor Inc. outbid
Toronto-based Rogers Communications Inc. for cable
operator Videotron-has created an albatross. Rousseau
has written down the caisse's 45% stake in Quebecor
Media to a bone-tingling $435 million. The unit that
includes Videotron has lost 85% of its value in two
years
Former caisse CEO Jean-Claude Scraire and his
deputy, Michel Nadeau, lost their jobs over this. But
they
were sacrificial lambs. The telephone lines between
the caisse and the Quebec Ministry of Finance are rarely
quiet; few believe the caisse backstopped Quebecor
without a nod, or prod, from the Parti Quebecois government. "The
caisse cannot act like a lamb when it moves in a forest
full of wolves," then-Finance Minister Bernard
Landry said during the Videotron battle. Liberal regimes
likewise have used the caisse politically (remember
the move to block Loblaw from swallowing Steinberg?).
If Rousseau is serious about change, he will have to
persuade his political masters-of whatever stripe-to
release their grip on the institution founded in 1965,
in large part to wrest control of Quebec's economy
from the ruling anglophone business class.
Rousseau,
at first, seems an odd midwife to oversee this rebirth.
His nationalist credentials are irrefutable-head
of Economistes pour le OUI in 1980, responsible for
a pivotal 1991 study that low-balled an independent
Quebec's share of the federal debt, confidant to
Lucien Bouchard. Yet, it may just be his devotion
to la cause that makes Rousseau an ideal candidate
to reform the caisse. No one can accuse him of being
a traitor. Meanwhile, his credibility in business
circles and his reputation for willfulness make it
clear he didn't take the caisse job-at a reported
$500,000, or fraction of his former bank-CEO salary-to
implement orders from Quebec City. "No, no,
no. Not Henri-Paul. He's big in all senses-not just
physical stature," says Roy Firth, a senior
vice-president at Manulife Financial who worked under
Rousseau at Laurentian in the 1990s. Adds Henri Masse,
president of the Quebec Federation of Labour and
a caisse board member: "Henri-Paul is direct.
I much prefer a grouch to someone who beats around
the bush. I'm a bit of a grouch myself."
"
Henri-Paul has this aura of strength. When he comes
into the room, it's electric." The speaker is
Lucien Bouchard. Rousseau and he have been intimates
since they met in 1990. Since then, the former PQ premier
has been a frequent visitor to Rousseau's farm in Quebec's
Eastern Townships and can attest to the quality (Canada
No. 1, very clear) of the maple syrup it produces. "He's
very proud of that," Bouchard chuckles. "But
you must know, his operation is completely run by computers.
So his performance as a maple syrup producer may be
due more to the computers than Henri-Paul's artisanal
flair."
Rousseau is no amateur acericulteur. Last year, his
farm yielded 3,600 litres of the quintessential Canadian
delicacy, an output worthy of a full-time maple farmer. "It's
something that can occupy your brain substantially,
because there's a lot of nitty-gritty to it," Rousseau
says. "Some people golf, some read. I do this." The
grouch in him bristles, though, when pressed for
financial disclosure. "This is too private a
question. Let's just say my wife is convinced I'll
never make money at it. But I think otherwise."
Where some see an impossible task at the caisse-remaking
an institution that's deeply rooted in the collective
psyche-Rousseau sees the chance of a lifetime. "It
has happened a couple of times in my professional
life," he says, "that I have felt that
I am in the right place at the right time. This is
one of them. This is a fantastic organization; there
is so much brainpower. To arrive at a time we are
facing such a complex situation, it's just a great,
great opportunity. I do sense, internally and externally,
that people want change to happen. So when you combine
all this, a man should be happy."
In March, Rousseau
unveiled far-reaching proposals to assert the caisse's
independence from the government,
starting with a restructuring of the board. Currently,
most board members are political appointees or
unofficial representatives of their constituencies,
such as
Quebec's labour federations or the pension and
insurance plans whose money is managed by the caisse.
The chairman
and CEO is all-powerful, answerable, it seems,
only to Quebec City. Rousseau wants a mostly independent
board with a non-executive chairman. Instead of
the
government naming the CEO, Rousseau thinks the
board alone should have the power to hire-and fire-the
chief executive.
The changes, he says, are essential to
rebuilding the caisse's credibility. Perceptions
of political
interference
can never be dispelled unless an independent board
becomes the sole arbiter of caisse affairs. And,
as the biggest player on Canada's stock markets,
the caisse must lead by example. "It would be
difficult for us to push for more transparency and
better governance at the companies we invest in if
we don't practise a minimum of what we preach," Rousseau
says.
But the most revolutionary item on his agenda is
the redefinition of the caisse's very mission.
As articulated
by the apparatchiks who ushered in the Quiet Revolution
in the 1960s (future PQ premier Jacques Parizeau
at the head of the pack), the caisse's mandate
was a happy confluence of two objectives-earning better
returns than the feds by repatriating Quebeckers'
pension contributions from Ottawa (through the
creation
of the Quebec Pension Plan) and using the domestic
savings to lever growth in the province. But the
objectives are not always complementary, and the
law governing the caisse is silent on which should
take precedence. The informal mandate is an extrapolation
of Quiet Revolution speeches by Liberal premier
Jean Lesage.
Rousseau wants to modernize the mission. The legislation
will say that the caisse can contribute to the development
of the Quebec economy only by pursuing the best returns
for its depositors-if Rousseau gets his way. But
he's acting as if he already had. "Job number
one here is to manage the money of depositors. Anything
else comes after that. If ever there is a tradeoff
between managing money-which is protecting the capital
and looking for the best return given the risk we're
ready to take-and anything else, I'll be selecting
the first objective."
Twice a week, Rousseau gets together with his 20-something
sons-6 foot 6 and 6 foot 3-to shoot some hoops with
a bunch of the boys' friends. As a centre at the
University of Sherbrooke, Rousseau was a star on
a provincial championship team in 1967. If Michael
Jordan's pending retirement has left him in a funk,
at least Rousseau's own on-court career has been
rejuvenated by his sons' invitation to play. "They're
all younger and faster-and most of them taller-than
me. So, it's a thrill."
Such an ungrouchy sentiment
is testimony to the importance Rousseau accords family.
He has been married for
32 years to Monique Gregoire, one of Quebec's most
seasoned television business reporters. The couple
are parents to the two boys, an aeronautics engineer,
27, an economics major, 25; and a 23-year-old daughter,
who is a classical harpist. Her husband's appointment
may have put a crimp in Gregoire's career-to avoid
conflicts, she can't cover caisse-related stories
at the Quebecor Media-owned TVA-but not, apparently,
their social calendar. The couple are frequent
hosts at their 19th-century farmhouse near Dunham,
where
friends join in an obligatory sing-along. A more
traditional modern family would be hard to find.
Rousseau,
54, grew up in a very different kind of household.
His father died when Henri-Paul, the youngest
of
eight children, was five years old. Yvette Rousseau,
a schoolteacher, moved the family from tiny St-Eleuthere-de-Kamouraska,
on the lower St. Lawrence River, to Coaticook to
find work in the booming textile mills that then
dotted the Eastern Townships. "Teaching didn't
pay enough to support a family of eight kids, so
she had to switch to the factory," Rousseau
recalls. As a machine operator at Penman's Co. Ltd.,
Yvette Rousseau was exposed to the primitive working
conditions that were one of the scandals of the Duplessis
era. She found her calling as a labour activist and
was eventually elected vice-president of the Confederation
des syndicats nationaux (CSN), Quebec's second-biggest
labour federation. She went on to found the Quebec
Council on the Status of Women, a role that caught
the attention of Pierre Trudeau, who tapped her to
help set up and eventually chair the Canadian Advisory
Council on the Status of Women. In 1979, Trudeau
appointed her to the Senate, where she served until
her death in 1988.
"
She was a fantastic woman, indeed," Rousseau says
of his mother, who instilled in him the ambition that
won the then-unilingual francophone several scholarships
to complete an economics doctorate at the University
of Western Ontario. His thesis-an econometric model
on the way people behave when economic forecasts don't
come true, which might prove useful in his current
job-was recognized as the best in his class. Several
summers working at the Bank of Canada left Rousseau
ready to embark on a career there. But he had a change
of heart and headed for academe-first at Universite
du Quebec a Montreal, and then, for a decade starting
in 1975, at Universite Laval.
It was during his stint
at Laval that Rousseau headed Economistes pour le
OUI, a fringe group that made
the economic case for sovereignty during the 1980
referendum campaign. His sovereigntist ardour was
not bred in the bone: His mother, by then a Liberal
senator, was a strident campaigner for the NON
side. Today, Rousseau won't discuss politics-period.
He made
a smooth transition to the corporate world in 1986,
joining National Bank of Canada as chief
economist. CEO Michel Belanger became his mentor,
and before long promoted him to senior vice-president,
treasury and financial markets. Many thought Belanger
was grooming a successor. But then, History happened.
In
June, 1990. Canada was plunged into crisis by the
collapse of the Meech Lake Accord promising Quebec "distinct
society" status. Hundreds of thousands of Quebeckers
marched to show their indignation. Polls put support
for sovereignty at more than 60%. The PQ clamoured
for an immediate referendum. To buy time, Liberal
Premier Robert Bourassa tapped Belanger, a known
federalist, and Jean Campeau, a former caisse CEO
and future PQ finance minister, to co-chair a commission
to examine, among other things, the feasibility of
sovereignty.
Belanger turned to Rousseau to become commission
secretary, essentially ringmaster of the body's proceedings
and voluminous research. The commission produced
an infamous study pegging an independent Quebec's
share of the federal debt at only 18.5%, well below
the province's 24% share of the Canadian population.
The study was ridiculed by economists outside Quebec,
but Rousseau was more concerned with the job of keeping
federalist and sovereigntist commission members from
each other's throats. "A friend has often said
to me that if I didn't have an MBA before Belanger-Campeau,
I sure got one there," Rousseau recalls. Adds
Bouchard, who was a commission member and emerging
leader of the Bloc Quebecois at the time: "We
were walking on a tightrope; the risk of the commission
rupturing was constant. Henri-Paul worked day and
night. I remember him waking me up in the middle
of the night with proposals." Many credit Rousseau
with the brilliant idea that ultimately rallied a
majority of commission members: Hold a referendum
on sovereignty in 1992 unless the rest of Canada
(ROC) comes back with a better constitutional offer
first.
The compromise placated the sovereigntists, including
Bouchard, because it seemed to guarantee a vote
on separation, now that the post-Meech ROC appeared
to have lost its appetite for courting Quebec.
But
it also pleased the federalists because it bought
Bourassa more time. In the end, Bourassa's calculation
proved more astute. The Charlottetown Accord of
1992 went down in flames in a Canada-wide referendum.
But the fact that Quebeckers voted on Charlottetown,
and not outright sovereignty, may have saved the
country, which just might make Rousseau a Canadian
hero, in spite of himself.
After Belanger-Campeau, Rousseau
returned to National, but having been passed over
for the CEO's job there,
he jumped to the Laurentian Group in 1992 to run
the Quebec financial conglomerate's general insurance
division. When Laurentian Bank CEO Dominic D'Alessandro
left to take the top job at Manulife Financial Corp.,
Rousseau took over. In more than eight years as the
bank's CEO, Rousseau held his own in a market dominated,
on the one hand, by the Toronto-based behemoths,
and on the other, by National and Mouvement Desjardins.
During his tenure, Laurentian's assets grew to $18
billion from $10 billion; the share price to $30
from $18. The feat is all the more laudable considering
Desjardins was, for most of Rousseau's term, both
Laurentian's controlling shareholder and a primary
competitor. Laurentian also faced a militant unionized
workforce. "I know the challenges he faced and
I don't think anyone could have done better than
he did," says Firth, who describes his ex-boss
as a dynamo. "Every day he'd come in with new
ideas. He didn't micromanage. But he stayed hands-on
with the important stuff."
More significant, perhaps, than Rousseau's corporate
duties at Laurentian were his behind-the-scenes political
ones. Rousseau was part of by then-Premier Bouchard's
inner circle, a tiny group that included Landry and
Louis Bernard, a former principal secretary to PQ
Premiers Rene Levesque and Jacques Parizeau who was
in senior management at Laurentian in the 1990s.
The group was widely seen as having more sway over
Bouchard than his own cabinet. "Henri-Paul was
extremely important to us," Bouchard concedes. "When
there were economic decisions to be made, I often
turned to him for advice." In 1996, Bouchard
approached Rousseau about the top job at Hydro-Quebec.
Rousseau passed, instead intent on managing Laurentian's
transition from Desjardins subsidiary to stand-alone
bank. Rousseau, however, remained ever close to the
Premier. He was considered instrumental in Bouchard's
decision to toe a moderate line on sovereignty and
embrace a zero-deficit policy. In return, Rousseau
defended some of Bouchard's more unpopular policies
in the business community, accompanying the premier
on trade missions and denouncing negative depictions
of Quebec's language laws in the U.S.
In late 2001, word
began to circulate that the Caisse de depot-collectively
known as le bas de laine des
Quebecois, or Quebeckers' nest egg-would be forced
to take a massive writedown on its Quebecor Media
investment. It was not an isolated case. As the
tech bubble burst, one caisse deal after another went
bad. Far too many of them involved private placements-investments
in companies that don't trade on the stock market.
While its counterparts like Teachers' had plowed
up to 75% of their assets into stocks, the caisse
until 1998 had been limited by provincial law to
holding a maximum of 40% of its assets in equities.
Then, with share prices reaching astronomical heights,
the caisse was forced to buy high to get into the
game and often invested in private companies outside
Canada. And the caisse, under CEO Jean-Claude Scraire,
desperately wanted to play.
Scraire envisioned the caisse
as a Top 10 contender among pension funds worldwide.
Foreign investments
doubled to constitute 42% of the caisse's portfolio
during Scraire's seven years at the helm. He opened
branch offices in such far-flung places as Bangkok
and Budapest; he actively sought mandates to manage
assets on behalf of other pension funds. It was
all aimed at building the critical mass Scraire believed
was needed to attract and keep top people at public-sector
salaries, while at the same time enhancing Montreal's
status as a financial centre. Accordingly, the
caisse
had $133 billion in assets under its belt in 2001,
compared with $45 billion in 1995, the year Scraire
took over. He sought to establish in-house the
expertise that most other global pension funds outsource.
That
in-house talent helped the caisse post a stellar
16.5% return in 1999, and earned it Reuters's designation
as the best fund management group in Canada the
following year. But with the growth came bureaucracy.
The global
network was costly and complicated. A booming market
made it easy to mask expenses; but by late 2001,
as tech-related losses mounted, there was no allowance
for waste.
Nor was there much goodwill toward Scraire.
A former PQ operative, Scraire had been appointed
by Jacques
Parizeau; he was hardly a favourite of the new guard
in the party who ascended under Bouchard and Landry.
What's more, Scraire had alienated many caisse board
members. Countless decisions, including the fateful
move to backstop Quebecor, were made in last-minute
conference calls. Directors resented it. They also
were turned off by Scraire's grandeur-his hobnobbing
with Hollywood honchos and fashion mavens, and overspending
by $100 million on a new headquarters for the caisse.
When Scraire mused about taking over National Bank
in a bid to protect the head office of the only Quebec-based
member of the Big Six, the board figured he had gone
too far. "The caisse is not there to take control
of every institution in Quebec," Masse of the
QFL remembers telling Scraire. "It is there
to fructify Quebeckers' nest egg."
There was never
much doubt about who would replace Scraire. Abilities
aside, Rousseau's political connections
are impeccable: Louis Bernard, the PQ's Mr. Fix-It,
is a friend and ex-colleague; Jean Saint-Gelais,
the Landry government's principal secretary, is
a former Rousseau student and protege. Then there is
Bouchard, whose influence remains ever-present
in
all things Pequiste.
Rousseau, appointed for a seven-year
term, had no sooner taken over in September than
copies of Good
to Great
began showing up on the desks of caisse employees.
The 2001 book, by U.S. management guru Jim Collins,
is a panegyric to the CEOs who propelled middle-of-the-road
companies like Gillette and Philip Morris to the
top of their class. It has become Rousseau's bible. "It
is a book I pass on to many people," he admits.
Collins lauds CEOs who are driven not by personal
ambition but devotion to their organization, who
push managers hard, and who focus on core strengths
and missions. It did not take long before Rousseau
began implementing the recipe at the caisse.
Last December,
barely two months into the job, Rousseau brought
down the axe. The positions of 19 executives
were eliminated. Eight of 11 foreign bureaus were
closed; 138 of the caisse's 958 non-real-estate
jobs were cut. Among the casualties was Claude Seguin,
who had presided over the caisse's private equity
business. Seguin, a former deputy finance minister,
was ultraconnected in Quebec City. His departure
alone signalled that Rousseau would not be a toady
to political friends.
More important than the management
purge was the massive reorganization that wiped
out much of the structure
that had been built up under Scraire. The private
equity and telecom divisions essentially were downgraded
to work-outs. Subsidiaries to develop Quebec's
fashion industry and its overall exports were shut
down.
For an opening act, it was cathartic.
The scaled-down
caisse will be less ambitious. Forget about managing
money for outsiders. Rousseau's caisse
has its hands full with its own portfolio. And even
then it will increasingly turn to outside managers
to invest a greater share of it. "We cannot
be good at all aspects of the job," Rousseau
says. Scraire would never have made such a concession.
Yet,
changing the caisse's investment tack seems easy
compared to overhauling its very mission. Rousseau's
proposals were supposed to be discussed at parliamentary
hearings in March. The provincial election delayed
the debate. But debate there will be. It's far
from certain any future Quebec government, Liberal
or
Pequiste, will agree to give up its prerogative
to appoint the caisse's CEO or relinquish its ultimate
right to guide the institution's affairs. There
is
still a strong constituency in Quebec that believes
the caisse should be a tool of economic nationalism.
Maitres chez nous, no matter how dated it sounds,
is still the collective mantra. Should Rousseau
fail in his mission, he may simply become the latest
in
a long line of CEOs who never could really master
the caisse. Plus ca change
Mid-March, and the sap still
isn't running at Rousseau's farm. A brutal winter
in Eastern Canada has delayed
the onset of the maple syrup season. It's beyond
even Rousseau's control. "Spring is late. Let's
hope it lasts a long time, otherwise," he sighs.
In the end, Rousseau philosophizes, the lives of
the acericulteur and the money manager converge. "Syrup
production is a lot like the stock market-a lot of
uncertainty."
All material copyright Thomson Canada
Limited or its licensors. All rights reserved.
|